The US Department of Trade dramatically increased rates for the import of Chinese solar producers who are active in Vietnam after the Agency concluded that China subsidizes raw materials that companies can use in their Vietnamese factories.
The US Department of Commerce reports that the incorrect cross -border subsidies from China has discovered to curb the costs of the solar technology factories in Vietnam, so that the agency has encouraged to revise the proposed tasks about the US import of them drastically and upwards, according to the recently worked provision of the agency.
Commerce applied the sharp increases to its preliminary anti-subsidy or countervailing, rates announced on December 1 due to solar input from Vietnam, now the largest source of American solar input. The newest step from the agency produced provisional anti-subsidy rates that approached or even more than 100% of the value of imports for various of the most famous Chinese companies that produce in Vietnam, including Jinko Solar and Trina Solar.
Such revisions of trade in business sometimes arise after the agency proposes provisional tasks, as the Department did in this case on December 1, after the trade had more time to complete the investigation that it had not finished before the provisional determination.
The Department has issued the revisions after providing for the time being that China subsidizes the factories of its companies in Vietnam in the form of solar waffles and solar glass at prices below the market rates. Although commercial lawsuits are subtle, complicated and controversial, subsidies are not inherently considered incorrect, unless they in fact enable the government of one country to disturb the domestic industry of a goal country anti-competitive.
But in the US, the commercial matters of the solar industry to curb the circumvent of the Chinese solar industry of import duties that the American industry is protected in earlier cases, anti-subsidy rates are only one side of the medal. On the other hand, anti -dumping rights have been calibrated to compensate for the unfair effects of import that are priced under the production costs of home or low enough to unfairly undermine domestic industry.
The two forms of import tax cannot be easily added together to derive the total tasks under the rules of trade mathematics. But the revised and combined provisional tasks seem, if completed, if completed, to change the Calculus of Chinese imports from Vietnam in the American market.
Combined provisional anti-subsidy tasks now vary from 81.03% to 217.40% for the largest Chinese producers, according to a release of Wiley Rein, a law firm in Washington, DC, that PV Magazine USA verified against trade documents with details about the revisions.
Tim Brightbill, a trade lawyer from Wiley Rein, who has been representing domestic solar producers since 2011, said that the “substantial increases” of the commerce reflect how many Vietnamese plants benefit from subsidies in the form of highly discounted waffles, solar flas and other inputs from China.
Brightbill represents the American Alliance for Solar Manufacturing Trade Committee, a coalition of more than half a dozen domestic solar producers anti-circumvency cases About the import of Chinese company from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam.
“We are pleased to see that the Commerce Department tackles powerful transnational subsidies that are provided by Chinese entities in Vietnam and other third countries,” he said. “This underlines the level of unfair trade with which American solar manufacturers are forced to contend.”
Based on producer production, Commerce has revised provisional anti-subsidy rates on import from Vietnam of 2.85% for Chinese producers JA Solar, Jinko Solar and Trina Solar up to 27.73% for JA and 92.56% for both Jinko and Trina. The provisional input load on the import of the Vietnamese solar energy has jumped from zero to 157.38% for boviet -zonne energy.
After the revisions, the provisional anti-subsidy and anti-dumping rates now form up to a total of 217.40% for Boviet Solar, 81.03% for Ja Solar, 164.41% for Jinko Solar, 152.58% for Trina Solar and 363.84% for all others.
However, the provisional revisions are not fully in force. Trade is expected to issue its final provision on both anti-subsidy and anti-dumping rates on 18 April. But before those rates could fully enter into force, the American International Trade Commission should make a definitive decision that the import from the four Southeast Asian countries has considerably damaged the American domestic solar industry.
The committee, which last June made a favorable preliminary ruling on that question in essence to start things, has planned a definitive hearing on the issue before 15 April and can then take until 2 July to make a final decision.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to work with us and reuse part of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
Popular content
